DOW-UAP-D50-Email-Correspondence-INDOPACOM-April-2025

I just got off the phone with the unit that flies
They said to me
(b) (6)
1.4(a)Redaction reason · 1.4 (a)Military plans, weapons systems, or operationsView all redaction codes →
that the two lines listed are on the UNCLASSIFIED level and that adding in
the AOR as INDOPACOM is also at the UNCLASSIFIED level.
(b) (6)
PAROC Intel Data Analysis Technician
Team Lead
12 AF / DET 3
(b) (6)
1.4(a)Redaction reason · 1.4 (a)Military plans, weapons systems, or operationsView all redaction codes →
(b) (6)
CLASSIFICATION: SECRET//NOFORN
Hello,
Per our conversaƟon, can you please confirm that the
tearlines below
are at the UNCLASSIFIED level? Also, could you please confirm that we can
use the AOR INDOPACOM.
Thank you,
(b) (6)
1

(b) (6)
CLASSIFICATION: SECRET//NOFORN
(b) (6)
CLASSIFICATION: SECRET//NOFORN
Hello,
I wanted to clarify that these tearlines are approved at the UNCLASSIFIED
level.
1.4(a)Redaction reason · 1.4 (a)Military plans, weapons systems, or operationsView all redaction codes →
on 10APR25
//UNCLASSIFIED//
US AIRCRAFT OBSERVED 1X POSS UAP FOR 12 SECONDS AT 2353Z, FLYING AT UNK
ALTITUDE AND UNK SPEED, NO INTERFERENCE WAS NOTED.
//UNCLASSIFIED//
on 11APR25
1.4(a)Redaction reason · 1.4 (a)Military plans, weapons systems, or operationsView all redaction codes →
//UNCLASSIFIED//
US AIRCRAFT OBSERVED 1X POSS UAP FOR 23 SECONDS AT 0007Z, FLYING AT UNK
ALTITUDE AND UNK SPEED, NO INTERFERENCE WAS NOTED.
//UNCLASSIFIED//
Thank you,
InformaƟon Disclosure Analyst
(b) (6)
Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security
(b) (6)
2